Tuesday, February 5, 2008
Malachai Richter was a big fan of the local music scene in Chicago. However, he was also very outgoing in the issues that he was passionate about. Although he was popular with other fans of underground music in the Windy City, he didn’t establish many deep friendships. I think the fact that he was popular with many, but close to so few established an ethos of acquaintance but not necessarily a strong sense of relation. The fact that he went through a process of self immolation did wake up many of the locals in Chicago and some of the people across the nation. However, many people thought Richter may have been just as mentally disturbed as he was passionate. I think that because he seemed to be somewhat of a loner below the surface, it contributed to the uncertainty of Richter’s motives. Cindy Sheehan on the other hand is the mother of a fallen soldier who was killed in the line of duty. Sheehan admits to being against the war from the very beginning, but never started preaching anti-war activism until her son died. I think the fact that Sheehan is the mother of a fallen soldier arouses a sense of pity and empathy. Sheehan refers to Bush and his staff not only as bad decision makers but also murderers. On the background information page it refers to her as calling Bush a “bigger terrorist than Osama Bin Ladin.” Both Richter and Sheehan want to convince people that the war is unjustifiable, however their methods and character are quite different. If I was forced to choose I would have to say Sheehan’s ethos is more persuasive because one can relate to her better, whereas Malachai is someone that we are familiar with mostly on the surface.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I agree with your thoughts on Malachais ethos being weak because of his impersonal ties around the community. I also agree with the fact that Sheehan had a stronger ethos built out of pity because she is the mother of a fallen soldier. However, to me, the rash statements she about Bush being a stronger terrorist the Osama Bin Laden lost credibility for her in my mind. The fact that Bin Laden maliciously terrorized his own country for many years and then brought down the twin towers and crashed into the pentagon successfully killing many Americans and hurting our economy, is far worse then what Bush has done.
I think you are correct in saying that Malachi's way of protesting was not really effective. People thought he was mentally ill for doing it, and I think this defeated the purpose of his way of protesting. He just got people to pay attention to the violence of his way of protesting, instead of showing people what he was protesting against.
That was a great point that Sheehan didn't begin to protest unitl after her son was killed in the war. I never thought about that! I mean, would she have been so passionate about peace if he served a tour and came home safely? Would she have reacted differently if her son arrived home and told her that he felt the war was worth fighting? Is her protest really just an outlet for her emotional pain from her loss?
You made a great point about her starting the protests after her son had been killed. As Christa mentioned, I think the activism was a way for Sheehan to cope with her emotional pain, albeit a strong and loud one.
Post a Comment